Key result
Preoperative intragastric balloon prior to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy resulted in significantly higher excess weight loss at 12 months compared to liraglutide (39.9% vs 25%; p<0.05).
Why the study?
In super-obese patients, bariatric surgery is challenging due to anatomical and anesthesiologic issues, prompting bridging therapies to enhance preoperative weight loss and decrease perioperative risks.
Does preoperative intragastric balloon improve weight loss compared to liraglutide in super-obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy?
Cohort (n=86)
Does preoperative intragastric balloon improve weight loss compared to liraglutide in super-obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy?
Absolute Event Rate: 39.9% vs 25%
p-value: p=<0.05
In super-obese patients, an intragastric balloon as a bridge to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy resulted in greater weight loss at 12 months compared to preoperative liraglutide.
Preoperative IGB was associated with greater post-LSG weight loss than liraglutide in super-obese patients; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
INTRODUCTION: Bariatric surgery is a safe and effective treatment for obesity, although in super-obese patients (BMI ≥50 kg/m2) it can become challenging for anatomical and anesthesiologic issues. Several bridging therapies have been proposed to increase preoperative weight loss and decrease perioperative morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of different two-stage approaches in super-obese patients: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) following preoperative liraglutide therapy versus LSG with preoperative intragastric balloon (IGB) during a 1-year follow-up. METHODS: Clinical records of 86 patients affected by super-obesity who underwent two-stage approach between January 2019 and January 2022 were retrospectively reviewed using a prospectively maintained database. Patients were separated into two groups: those managed with preoperative IGB and those with liraglutide 3.0 mg prior to LSG. Weight (kg), BMI (kg/m2), %EWL, and %EBWL were reported and compared between the two groups at the end of bridging therapy, at 6th month and 12th month postoperatively. Postoperative complications were recorded. RESULTS: Forty-four patients underwent IGB insertion prior to LSG, while 42 were treated with liraglutide. There were no statistical differences in baseline weight and BMI. At the end of preoperative treatment, the group treated with IGB reported a significant reduction in BMI (47.24 kg/m2 vs. 53.6 kg/m2; p < 0.391) compared to liraglutide group. There were no differences recorded between the two groups concerning postoperative complications. At 6 months, the liraglutide group had lower %EWL (15.8 vs. 29.84; p < 0.05) and %EBWL (27.8 vs. 55.6; p < 0.05) when compared to IGB group. At 12 months, the IGB preserved with higher %EWL (39.9 vs. 25; p < 0.05) and %EBWL (71.2 vs. 42; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: A two-stage therapeutic approach with IGB prior to LSG in super-obese patients could be considered an attractive alternative to liraglutide as bridging therapy before bariatric surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martines et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Super-obesity (n=86). Intragastric balloon (IGB) vs. Liraglutide 3.0 mg was evaluated on %EWL (excess weight loss) at 12 months (p=<0.05). Preoperative intragastric balloon prior to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy resulted in significantly higher excess weight loss at 12 months compared to liraglutide (39.9% vs 25%; p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: