Key result
This article reviews the purpose and process of benchmarking within UK health-care, specifically detailing the development and work of the National Neuroscience Benchmarking Group.
Describes the development and process of the National Neuroscience Benchmarking Group in UK healthcare.
May inform UK neuroscience benchmarking initiatives; leaves open effects on care quality or outcomes.
Benchmarking is a useful means of comparing outcomes among health-care institutions. In this article benchmarking will be discussed in terms of its purpose and process within UK health-care. In particular, the work to date of the National Neuroscience Benchmarking Group will be reviewed. This article describes the development of the group, outlines the various stages in the benchmarking process and considers some of the obstacles encountered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mary E Braine (2007) conducted a review in Neuroscience benchmarking. Benchmarking was evaluated. This article reviews the purpose and process of benchmarking within UK health-care, specifically detailing the development and work of the National Neuroscience Benchmarking Group.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: