Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Item selection procedures designed for computerized adaptive testing need to accurately estimate every taker's trait level (θ) and, at the same time, effectively use all items in a bank. Empirical studies showed that classical item selection procedures based on maximizing Fisher or other related information yielded highly varied item exposure rates; with these procedures, some items were frequently used whereas others were rarely selected. In the literature, methods have been proposed for controlling exposure rates; they tend to affect the accuracy in θ estimates, however. A modified version of the maximum Fisher information (MFI) criterion, coined the nearest-neighbors (NN) criterion, is proposed in this study. The NN procedure improves to a moderate extent the undesirable item exposure rates associated with the MFI criterion and keeps sufficient precision in θ estimates. The NN criterion will be compared with a few other existing methods in an empirical study using the mean squared errors in θ estimates and plots of item exposure rates associated with different θ distributions. Index terms: computerized adaptive testing, density estimation, Fisher information, item exposure rates, item response theory, selection criteria, trait estimation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: