The failure of empirical tight-binding interpolation schemes has given the impression that only the most sophisticated self-consistent calculations can provide accurate details of the electronic structure of noble metal surfaces. It is suggested here that a simple, nonempirical calculation in an atomic orbital basis can also yield a quantitatively useful picture, including the position and dispersion of prominent surface states and surface resonances at Cu(100) and Cu(111).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D.W. Bullett (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: