Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Although Ultrananocrystalline diamond (UNCD) has been proposed as a coating material for titanium biomedical implants, the biological effects and toxicity of UNCD particles that could eventually detach have not been studied to date. The biokinetics and biological effects of UNCD compared to titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ) nanoparticles was evaluated in vivo using Wistar rats ( n = 30) i.p. injected with TiO 2 , UNCD or saline solution. After 6 months, blood, lung, liver, and kidney samples were histologically analyzed. Oxidative damage by membrane lipidperoxidation (thiobarbituric acid reactive substances‐TBARS), generation of reactive oxygen species (superoxide anion‐ ), and antioxidant enzymes (superoxide dismutase‐SOD, catalase‐CAT) was evaluated in lung and liver. Histologic observation showed agglomerates of TiO 2 or UNCD in the parenchyma of the studied organs, though there were fewer UNCD than TiO 2 deposits. In addition, TiO 2 caused areas compatibles with foci of necrosis in the liver and renal hyaline cylinders. Regarding UNCD, no membrane damage (TBARS) or mobilization of enzymatic antioxidants was observed either in lung or liver samples. No variations in generation were observed in lung (Co: 35.1 ± 4.02 vs. UNCD: 48 ± 9.1, p > 0.05). Conversely, TiO 2 exposure caused production of in alveolar macrophages and consumption of catalase ( p < 0.05). The studied parameters suggest that UNCD caused neither biochemical nor histological alterations, and therefore may prove useful as a surface coating for biomedical implants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tasat et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: