Key result
Rotarix and RotaTeq vaccines demonstrate similar efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety, protecting against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis into the second year of follow-up.
Why the study?
Do live, orally administered rotavirus vaccines prevent severe rotavirus gastroenteritis in infants and young children?
Do live, orally administered rotavirus vaccines prevent severe rotavirus gastroenteritis in infants and young children?
Rotarix and RotaTeq are safe and effective for preventing severe rotavirus gastroenteritis in infants, though more efficacy data is needed in low-income countries.
May support interchangeable rotavirus vaccine use in infants; leaves open comparative data needs in low-income countries.
Rotaviruses are the most common enteric pathogens to cause acute diarrhoea in infants and young children throughout the world. Two new live, orally administered vaccines (Rotarix and RotaTeq) that provide protection against rotavirus infections are now available and have been licensed in many countries in Europe, North and Latin America. Two recent large clinical trials have demonstrated that their efficacy, immunogenicity and safety, including absence of vaccine-associated intussusception in young infants, are remarkably similar. The protection against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis extends into the second year of follow up for both vaccines. Rotarix and RotaTeq vaccines can be coadministered with routine childhood vaccines. However, more data on the efficacy of these two new vaccines in low-income nations are needed, particularly in Asia and Africa, before global inclusion of rotavirus vaccines into national immunisation programmes can be recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lepage et al. (2007) conducted a review in rotavirus disease. Rotarix and RotaTeq vaccines was evaluated on severe rotavirus gastroenteritis. Rotarix and RotaTeq vaccines demonstrate similar efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety, protecting against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis into the second year of follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: