Key result
The high-risk category of the dynamic Barthel index-based risk stratification program was independently associated with a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality compared to the low-risk category (HR 5.052).
Why the study?
Dynamic trajectory evaluation of functional capacity during hospitalization may provide added prognostic information compared to admission-only Barthel index assessment in patients with ACS.
Does a dynamic Barthel index-based risk stratification program (DBRP) predict mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Cohort (n=2,837)
Yes
Does a dynamic Barthel index-based risk stratification program (DBRP) predict mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
A dynamic risk stratification program based on trajectories of functional capacity (Barthel index) during hospitalization independently predicts long-term all-cause and cardiac mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
May refine ACS risk assessment via in-hospital functional trajectories; leaves open whether DBRP-guided care improves outcomes.
Background As a validated assessment tool for functional disability (activities of daily living), the Barthel index (BI) assessed initially at admission has the potential to stratify patients with high-risk acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Dynamic trajectory evaluation of functional capacity in hospitals may provide more prognostic information. We aimed to establish a novel dynamic BI-based risk stratification program (DBRP) during hospitalization to predict outcomes among ACS patients. Methods A total of 2,837 ACS patients were included from the Retrospective Multicenter Study for Early Evaluation of Acute Chest Pain. The DBRP rating (low, medium, and high-risk categories) was calculated from dynamic BI at admission and discharge. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcome was cardiac mortality. Results Of all the included patients, 312 (11%) died during a median follow-up period of 18.0 months. Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that the cumulative mortality was significantly higher in patients in the higher risk category according to the DBRP. Multivariable Cox regression analysis indicated that, compared to the low-risk category, the higher risk category in the DBRP was an independent strong predictor of all-cause mortality after adjusting for confounding factors (medium-risk category: hazard ratio [HR]: 1.756, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.214–2.540; P = 0.003; high-risk category: HR: 5.052, 95% CI: 3.744–6.817; P < 0.001), and the same result was found for cardiac mortality. Conclusion The DBRP was a useful risk stratification tool for the early dynamic assessment of patients with ACS. Clinical trial registration [ http://www.chictr.org.cn ], identifier [ChiCTR1900024657].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Acute coronary syndrome (n=2,837). High-risk category in dynamic Barthel index-based risk stratification program (DBRP) vs. Low-risk category in DBRP was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 5.052, 95% CI 3.744-6.817, p=<0.001). The high-risk category of the dynamic Barthel index-based risk stratification program was independently associated with a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality compared to the low-risk category (HR 5.052).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: