This study offers a systematic and critical examination of the research trends, thematic patterns, and scholarly evolution of Open Praxis during the 2023–2024 publication period. Employing a multi-method approach that combines systematic review, bibliometric analysis, and data mining, the researchers analyzed a total of 81 articles indexed in the Web of Science database. The findings reveal significant growth in publication volume, an increasing trend toward multi-authored collaborations, and broad thematic diversification. Three dominant research themes were identified: (1) “Openness in Education,” reflecting macro-level engagements with open education, Open Educational Resources (OER), and Open Educational Practices (OEP); (2) “Technology-empowered Open and Distance Learning (ODL) Practices,” capturing the meso-level integration of digital technologies and online learning innovations; and (3) “Human-AI Symbiosis and AI-powered Education,” highlighting emerging micro-level discourses around artificial intelligence (AI), generative AI, and their implications for educational practice. The analysis also shows a strong association with the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) of Quality Education (Goal 4), but limited engagement with other SDGs, pointing to a need for broader interdisciplinary attention. The study concludes that future directions should emphasize a more expansive, socially responsive, and critically engaged vision of openness to sustain the journal’s transformative role in the evolving landscape of open, distance, and flexible education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bozkurt et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: