This study sought to determine the change in level of leadership skills of participants in a community leadership program and the degree of response shift (change in level of understanding of leadership skills) in the self-report measures employed. While most of the participants reported increases in their leadership skills at the end of the program, differences were found between their self-report ratings using the pretest/posttest approach and the then/posttest approach. The degree of response shift (pre/then comparison) was also evident. The findings from this study together with other studies cited suggest that when employing self-report measures, the then/post approach provides a less conservative and more accurate means of assessing leadership skill development than would the traditional pretest/posttest approach. Suggestions for reducing the effects of response shift are also offered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rohs et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: