PURPOSE: To compare the possible protective effects of the ultraviolet (UV)-filtering and blue light-filtering SN60AT intraocular lens (IOL) and the untinted UV-filtering SA60AT IOL with regard to light-induced stress on human retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany. METHODS: Primary human RPE cells were exposed to white light, and a tinted or untinted IOL was placed in the light beam. After 15 to 60 minutes of irradiation, cell viability was determined by a colorimetric test (tetrazolium dye-reduction assay) and a microscopic live/dead assay. The expression of vascular endothelial growth factor-alpha (VEGF-alpha), Bax, and Bcl-2 and their mRNA was determined by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Western blotting. RESULTS: Without an IOL, white-light exposure decreased cell viability compared with the decrease with the nonirradiated control in a time-dependent manner. Light-induced cell death was significantly reduced by both the tinted IOL and untinted IOL. The combined UV and blue-light filtering attenuated light-induced cell damage significantly more than UV filtering alone. Results of RT-PCR and Western blotting showed a significant time-dependent decrease in Bcl-2 and increase in Bax and VEGF-alpha that were significantly less with the tinted IOL than with the untinted IOL. CONCLUSIONS: Both IOLs reduced light-induced RPE damage. The UV- and blue light-filtering IOL reduced damage more than the conventional IOL. This supports the hypothesis that blue light-filtering IOLs may prevent retinal damage in clinical use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kernt et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: