To generate baseline data for the purpose of monitoring the efficacy of remediation of a degraded landscape, we demonstrate a method for 3‐dimensional mapping of electrical conductivity of saturated soil paste extract (EC e ) across a study field in central Haryana, India. This is achieved by establishing a linear relationship between calculated true electrical conductivity (σ) and laboratory measured EC e at various depths (0–0.3, 0.3–0.6, 0.6–0.9, and 0.9–1.2 m). We estimate σ by inverting DUALEM‐21S apparent electrical conductivity (EC a ) data using a quasi‐3‐dimensional inversion algorithm (EM4Soil‐V302). The best linear relationship (EC e = −11.814 + 0.043 × σ) was achieved using full solution (FS), S1 inversion algorithm, and a damping factor (λ) of 0.6 that had a large coefficient of determination ( R 2 = 0.84). A cross‐validation technique was used to validate the model, and given the high accuracy (RMSE = 8.31 dS m −1 ), small bias (mean error = −0.0628 dS m −1 ), large R 2 = 0.82, and Lin's concordance (0.93), between measured and predicted EC e , we were well able to predict the EC e distribution at all the four depths. However, the predictions made in the topsoil (0–0.3 m) at a few locations were poor due to limited data availability in areas where EC a changed rapidly. In this regard, improvements in prediction can be achieved by collection of EC a in more closely spaced transects, particularly in areas where EC a varies over short spatial scales. Also, equivalent results can be achieved using smaller combinations of EC a data (i.e., DAULEM‐1S, DUALEM‐2S), although with some loss in precision, bias, and concordance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koganti et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: