Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective To assess the radiation dose and image quality of ultra‐low dose ( ULD )‐C T colonography ( CTC ) obtained with the combined use of automatic tube current ( mA s) modulation with a quality reference mA s of 25 and sinogram‐affirmed iterative reconstruction ( SAFIRE ), compared to low‐dose ( LD ) C TC acquired with a quality reference mA s of 55 and reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP). Methods Eighty‐two patients underwent ULD ‐ CTC acquisition in prone position and LD ‐ CTC acquisition in supine position. Both ULD ‐ CTC and LD ‐ CTC protocols were compared in terms of radiation dose [weighted volume computed tomography dose index ( CTDI vol ) and effective dose], image noise, image quality, and polyp detection. Results The mean effective dose of ULD ‐ CTC was significantly lower than that of LD ‐ CTC (0.98 and 2.69 mS v respectively, P < 0.0001) with an overall dose reduction of 63.2%. Image noise was comparable between ULD ‐ CTC and LD ‐ CTC (28.6 and 29.8 respectively, P = 0.09). There was no relevant difference when comparing image quality scores and polyp detection for both 2D and 3D images. Conclusion ULD ‐ CTC allows to significantly reduce the radiation dose without meaningful image quality degradation compared to LD ‐ CTC .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cianci et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: