Disturbed and undisturbed Mourning Dove (Zenaida macroura) nests were compared for differences in daily survival probabilities and discrepancies in the relationships between nest-site features and nesting outcome.At 3-day intervals, attending adults were flushed from disturbed nests (n = 51), whereas undisturbed nests (n = 50) were checked from a distance so that adults did not flush.Disturbed nests had significantly (P < 0.1) lower daily survival probabilities; this trend was evident during both the incubation and nestling stages, but was significant only during the former.For disturbed nests, two nest-site features (nestbowl depth and nest support) were related to success (P < 0.1).In contrast, success of undisturbed nests was related to four variables (substrate height above nest level, relative light intensity above the nest, nest concealment, and nest width).These results indicate that standard nest-checking procedures influence nesting success and confound interpretation of relationships between nest-site features and nesting outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Westmoreland et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: