Key result
The overall surgical site infection rate in rural and semi-urban Indian hospitals was 7.0%, with dirty wounds recording a significantly higher rate of infection than clean cases (30.0% vs 5.0%, p≤0.05).
Why the study?
Although rural and semi-urban hospitals cater to most of the Indian population, scarce data regarding surgical site infection rates and prevention practices are available from such hospitals.
Observational (n=287)
Yes
In rural and semi-urban Indian hospitals, the overall surgical site infection rate was 7.0%, indicating comparable or lower rates than other LMIC settings despite poor implementation of antimicrobial stewardship.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports targeted SSI prevention for dirty wounds in LMICs; leaves open stewardship effects in rural Indian settings.
BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) affect around a third of patients undergoing surgeries worldwide, annually. It is heterogeneously distributed with a higher burden in low and middle-income countries. Although rural and semi-urban hospitals cater to 60-70% of the Indian population, scarce data regarding SSI rates are available from such hospitals. The study aimed to determine the prevalent SSI prevention practices and existing SSI rates in the smaller rural and semi-urban hospitals in India. METHODS: This is a prospective study performed in two phases involving surgeons and their hospitals from Indian rural and semi-urban regions. In the first phase, a questionnaire was administered to surgeons enquiring into the perioperative SSI prevention practices and five interested hospitals were recruited for phase two which documented the rate of SSIs and factors affecting them. RESULTS: There was full compliance towards appropriate perioperative sterilisation practices and postoperative mop count practice at the represented hospitals. But prophylactic antimicrobials were continued in the postoperative period in more than 80% of the hospitals. The second phase of our study documented an overall SSI rate of 7.0%. The SSI rates were influenced by the surgical wound class with dirty wounds recording six times higher rate of infection than clean cases. CONCLUSIONS: SSI prevention practices and protocols were in place in all the less-resourced hospitals surveyed. The SSI rates are comparable or lower than other LMIC settings. However, this is accompanied by poor implementation of the antimicrobial stewardship guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nayan et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing general surgical and obstetrics-gynaecological procedures (n=287). Perioperative infection control practices and surgical wound class was evaluated on Overall surgical site infection (SSI) rate within 30 days postoperatively. The overall surgical site infection rate in rural and semi-urban Indian hospitals was 7.0%, with dirty wounds recording a significantly higher rate of infection than clean cases (30.0% vs 5.0%, p≤0.05).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: