Key result
Pharmacomechanical thrombectomy linked to ~26-point lower post-thrombotic syndrome risk vs anticoagulation in acute DVT.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the long-term outcomes, efficacy, and safety of pharmacomechanical thrombectomy compared with anticoagulation plus compression stockings in patients with proximal lower extremity deep vein thrombosis.
Does pharmacomechanical thrombectomy reduce the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome compared to conventional anticoagulation in patients with acute proximal lower extremity deep vein thrombosis?
Cohort (n=228)
Yes
Does pharmacomechanical thrombectomy reduce the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome compared to conventional anticoagulation in patients with acute proximal lower extremity deep vein thrombosis?
Pharmacomechanical thrombectomy significantly reduces the long-term incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome and recurrent thrombosis compared to conventional anticoagulation in patients with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis.
May support pharmaco-mechanical thrombectomy in acute proximal DVT; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Objective: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of pharmaco-mechanical thrombectomy and compare its effi ciency and safety against anticoagulation together with the use of compression stock-ings in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity. Methods: A total of 228 patients, between January 2013 and January 2020, who presented to the clinic with acute deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity were investigated retrospectively. There were 112 patients in the anticoagulation following pharmacomechanical thrombectomy group (Group 1) and 116 patients in the conventional anticoagulation with compression stockings group (Group 2). Results: There was no signifi cant difference in the post-thrombotic syndrome occurrence assessed with Villalta Scores at 6-month follow-up. However; at 12-, 24-and 36-month follow-up, the incidence of the post-thrombotic syndrome was lower in the Group 1 compared to Group 2 (21.4%, 30.3%, 36.6% vs. 33.6%, 53.4%, 61.2%). Insuffi cient recanalization was present in 41 of 112 patients at 36 months in the Group 1, and in 71 of 116 patients in Group 2 at 36 months; correlating to an absolute risk reduction of 25.6% (95% CI 9.2–37.5; p = 0.001). The recurrent thrombosis rates in the Group 2 were signifi cantly higher than Group 1 (18.9% vs 7.1%; p = 0.002) in the 6-to 36-month follow-up. Conclusion: The results of our study demonstrated that pharmacomechanical thrombectomy is a safe and effective treatment modality in case of lower extremity acute deep vein thrombosis. It has been associated with reduced post-thrombotic syndrome and recurrent venous thrombosis
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodoplu et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Acute proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (n=228). Pharmaco-mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) vs. Conventional anticoagulation with compression stockings was evaluated on Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) at 36 months (ARR 25.6%, 95% CI 9.2-37.5, p=0.001). Pharmaco-mechanical thrombectomy significantly reduced the absolute risk of post-thrombotic syndrome at 36 months by 25.6% compared to conventional anticoagulation in acute deep vein thrombosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: