Key result
Edoxaban was associated with a higher prevalence of postthrombotic syndrome compared with warfarin at 7 years (51% vs 42%; adjusted OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.0-2.6).
Why the study?
Postthrombotic syndrome affects quality of life after DVT, and inadequate vitamin K antagonist therapy is a known risk factor, prompting comparison between edoxaban and warfarin.
Does edoxaban reduce the prevalence of postthrombotic syndrome and improve quality of life compared with warfarin in patients with deep vein thrombosis?
RCT (n=316)
Randomized
Yes
Does edoxaban reduce the prevalence of postthrombotic syndrome and improve quality of life compared with warfarin in patients with deep vein thrombosis?
Odds Ratio: 1.6 (95% CI 1–2.6)
Absolute Event Rate: 51% vs 42%
Long-term follow-up of the Hokusai-VTE trial suggests that edoxaban may be associated with a higher prevalence of postthrombotic syndrome compared to warfarin, with no significant differences in quality of life.
Should not yet change anticoagulant choice for DVT; observational data leaves open higher PTS risk with edoxaban versus warfarin.
Background: Postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a long-term complication after deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and can affect quality of life (QoL). Pathogenesis is not fully understood but inadequate anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonists is a known risk factor for the development of PTS. Objectives: To compare the prevalence of PTS after acute DVT and the long-term QoL following DVT between patients treated with edoxaban or warfarin. Methods: We performed a long-term follow-up study in a subset of patients with DVT who participated in the Hokusai-VTE trial between 2010 and 2012 (NCT00986154). Primary outcome was the prevalence of PTS, defined by the Villalta score. The secondary outcome was QoL, assessed by validated disease-specific (VEINES-QOL) and generic health-related (SF-36) questionnaires. Results: Between 2017 and 2020, 316 patients were enrolled in 26 centers in eight countries, of which 168 (53%) patients had been assigned to edoxaban and 148 (47%) to warfarin during the Hokusai-VTE trial. Clinical, demographic, and thrombus-specific characteristics were comparable for both groups. Mean (SD) time since randomization in the Hokusai-VTE trial was 7.0 (1.0) years. PTS was diagnosed in 85 (51%) patients treated with edoxaban and 62 (42%) patients treated with warfarin (adjusted odds ratio 1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.6). Mean differences in QoL scores between treatment groups were not clinically relevant. Conclusion: Contrary to our hypothesis, the prevalence of PTS tended to be higher in patients treated with edoxaban compared with warfarin. No differences in QoL were observed. Further research is warranted to unravel the role of anticoagulant therapy on development of PTS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bistervels et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (n=316). Edoxaban vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Prevalence of postthrombotic syndrome (PTS), defined by the Villalta score (adjusted OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.6). Edoxaban was associated with a higher prevalence of postthrombotic syndrome compared with warfarin at 7 years (51% vs 42%; adjusted OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.0-2.6).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: