Why the study?
Does percutaneous coronary intervention compared to fibrinolysis affect the incidence of coronary artery bypass grafting within 30 days in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction?
Does percutaneous coronary intervention compared to fibrinolysis affect the incidence of coronary artery bypass grafting within 30 days in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction?
Coronary artery bypass grafting within 30 days of STEMI treated with PCI or fibrinolysis is uncommon (3.2%) but carries a high 30-day mortality risk of 10%.
Early CABG after STEMI carries high mortality; observational data leave open differential effects of PCI versus fibrinolysis.
OBJECTIVE: To calculate the incidence and analyse the indications and outcome after surgical revascularization within the first 30 days after randomization of 1572 patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) associated with ST-segment elevation (STEMI). DESIGN: Data regarding the patients undergoing heart surgery within the first 30 days after randomization were collected. RESULTS: Three patients (0.2%) with acute STEMI and randomized to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) underwent emergent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). A total of 50 patients (3.2%), 30 in the PCI group and 20 in the fibrinolysis group were revascularized by surgery within the first 30 days after randomization. The most frequent indication for surgery in both groups was unstable angina pectoris, followed by left main stenosis. The incidence of postoperative complications was higher compared with the outcome after elective CABG. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of emergency CABG in this study was low (0.2%) after treatment of acute MI with either PCI or fibrinolysis. The overall incidence within 30 days was 3.2%, however, the mortality is increased with a 30-day mortality of 10% in this high-risk patient group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kjærgård et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: