Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents an evaluation of the HAZUS-MH flood model conducted as part of the Harris County Risk Assessment Program completed in November, 2005. The county wide analysis proved the capability of the HAZUS-MH software for a large urban county application. For the pilot watershed study, the HAZUS-MH Level 1 analysis was quick and least costly. However, the loss estimates may be questionable. The Level 2 analysis produced much more reasonable loss estimates than the Level 1 analysis when compared with other detailed analyses. HAZUS-MH Level 2 estimated $179 million for 1% probability event and $286 million for 0.2% probability event building related economic loss for residential properties in White Oak Bayou watershed. This compares well with the results of the Section 211 Federal Flood Control Project: General Reevaluation Report study for the same area of $153 million for 1% and $292 million for 0.2% loss estimates. Both the building damage count and loss estimates from HAZUS-MH Level 2 showed a linear correlation with the Federal Flood Control Project results (R2=0.9997 for building damage count and R2=0.9786 for loss estimate). Based on comparison in this study, a HAZUS-MH Level 2 analysis appears to be a better, more cost-effective approach to achieve reliable results for risks assessment and mitigation planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aiju et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: