Key result
Cochlear implantation was performed in a 4-year-old male with Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome and a prolonged QT interval of 509 ms, requiring multidisciplinary and intensive care.
Why the study?
Patients with Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome face added intra- and postoperative challenges during cochlear implantation requiring specific precautions and multidisciplinary care.
Case Report (n=1)
Cochlear implantation in patients with Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome requires careful multidisciplinary planning and intensive care due to the high risk of sudden cardiac death and prolonged QT interval.
JLNS cochlear implantation requires multidisciplinary ICU planning; case leaves open standardized safety protocols.
Here, we describe the case of a pediatric patient who presented with an episode of absence seizures and was later diagnosed to have Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome (JLNS) and underwent cochlear implantation (CI). A 4-year-old male child born out of a third degree consanguineous marriage presented with congenital profound sensorineural hearing loss and an episode of absence seizures. Electrocardiogram showed a prolonged QT interval of 509 ms. The patient subsequently underwent CI. Here, we outline the challenges anticipated and the precautions to be taken when performing implantation on a patient with JLNS. JLNS is a rare autosomal recessive form of congenital long QT syndrome associated with congenital sensorineural deafness and a high incidence of sudden cardiac death in childhood. Patients with JLNS face added intra- and postoperative challenges during CI which require multidisciplinary and intensive care unit care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bharathi et al. (2022) conducted a case report in Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome (n=1). Cochlear implantation was evaluated. Cochlear implantation was performed in a 4-year-old male with Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome and a prolonged QT interval of 509 ms, requiring multidisciplinary and intensive care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: