Key result
The open-source software tool BAPTA provided automated, high-throughput analysis of cardiac action potentials that highly correlated (R2 0.91-0.99) with manual analyses across multiple species.
Why the study?
Cardiac action potential parameters are often quantified via time-consuming manual protocols or proprietary pipelines, with no tools available for automated cardiac action potential analysis and parameter quantification.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BAPTA is a free, open-source R-based tool that provides fast, reproducible, and scalable automated analysis of cardiac action potentials, demonstrating excellent correlation with traditional manual analysis.
The cardiac action potential (AP) is a key species-specific feature of cardiomyocytes that occurs in response to coordinated actions of ion channels. It represents the first step of the cardiac excitation-contraction coupling and it is crucial for cardiomyocyte (CM) physiology. Changes in the cardiac AP may primarily occur as a consequence of diseases or as a direct or unwanted response to drugs. Our ability to quantify these changes defines the reliability of our measurements and its throughput. Cardiac AP parameters are often quantified through manual time-consuming data analysis protocols or custom-made and proprietary data analysis pipelines; to the best of our knowledge, no tools are currently available for automated cardiac AP analysis and AP parameter quantification. Here we introduce a free and open source software tool named Batch Action PoTential Analyser (BAPTA), written in the R language, designed to i) overcome the inherent operator-dependent bias on trace selection affecting reproducibility, ii) vastly improve the throughput of the analyses of large datasets and iii) analyse both spontaneous and triggered APs from CMs of multiple species and origin. We present here four use-cases in which BAPTA can be used at high throughput to investigate the effects of: 1) a disease (cardiomyopathy) on rat CMs, 2) drugs on mouse pacemaker cells, 3) rate-dependency of AP duration in guinea pig CMs and 4) metabolic electrophysiological maturation in human stem-cell-derived CMs. Overall, BAPTA consistently provides faster, more reproducible and scalable readouts which excellently correlate with manual analyses performed by experienced electrophysiologists.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Леонов et al. (2023) studied this question. Batch Action PoTential Analyser (BAPTA) vs. Manual analysis was evaluated on Correlation of action potential parameters with manual analysis. The open-source software tool BAPTA provided automated, high-throughput analysis of cardiac action potentials that highly correlated (R2 0.91-0.99) with manual analyses across multiple species.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: