Key result
Mechanical abnormalities in contraction patterns were significantly more prevalent among symptomatic compared to asymptomatic patients with long-QT syndrome (77% vs. 19%, RR 2.75).
Why the study?
Does echocardiography improve risk stratification for arrhythmic events in genotype-positive long-QT syndrome patients?
Does echocardiography improve risk stratification for arrhythmic events in genotype-positive long-QT syndrome patients?
Relative Risk: 2.75
Absolute Event Rate: 77% vs 19%
Echocardiographic measurement of the electromechanical window may help risk stratify patients with long-QT syndrome for arrhythmic events.
This editorial refers to ‘Electromechanical window negativity in genotyped long-QT syndrome patients: relationship to arrhythmia risk’[†][1], by R.M.A. ter Bekk et al ., on page 179 Over 20 years ago we reported for the first time the presence of mechanical abnormalities in the contraction pattern of patients with the long QT syndrome (LQTS), showing the presence both of rapid early contraction and of an extended ‘plateau’ phase clearly visible at M-mode Doppler before rapid relaxation.1 These abnormalities were almost absent in controls and more prevalent among symptomatic than asymptomatic patients [77% vs. 19%, relative risk (RR) 2.75], suggesting their potential value for diagnosis and risk stratification of LQTS patients. This report and our subsequent evidence that these abnormalities were abolished by calcium blockers2 and could be the mechanical counterparts of early afterdepolarizations (EADs), thus being markers of arrhythmic propensity, were received with scepticism and essentially ignored. Eventually, an abnormal contraction pattern was confirmed by others, mostly using tissue Doppler imaging,3–5 thus ending the era in which LQTS was considered a pure electrical disease.6 Once set in motion, the ball keeps rolling. Now ter Bekk et al. 7 describe the presence of a negative ‘electromechanical window’ (EMW) in LQTS patients and report a strong association between a markedly negative value and arrhythmic events. One strength lies in the size of the population, almost 250 genotype-positive LQTS patients and 74 controls, much larger than previous studies.1–5 This allowed the authors … [1]: #fn-2
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferrari et al. (2014) conducted an editorial in Long-QT syndrome (LQTS) (n=324). Symptomatic status vs. Asymptomatic status was evaluated on Presence of mechanical abnormalities in contraction pattern (RR 2.75). Mechanical abnormalities in contraction patterns were significantly more prevalent among symptomatic compared to asymptomatic patients with long-QT syndrome (77% vs. 19%, RR 2.75).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: