To compare the long-term effect of natural lymphoblastoid interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha nl) and recombinant IFN-alpha 2a therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B, 210 patients in two trials were followed-up for 1.1-15.5 years following the end of therapy. They included 34 patients who received placebo (control), 67 treated with IFN-alpha nl (36 after prednisolone priming) and 109 treated with IFN-alpha 2a (56 after prednisolone priming). The cumulative sustained response was higher in patients who had been treated with IFN-alpha nl after prednisolone priming than was exhibited using IFN-alpha nl alone, IFN-alpha 2a alone or the placebo (P < 0.05), or IFN-alpha 2a following prednisolone priming (P = 0.052) at the end of 11 years. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was detected in 1.5% of the IFN-alpha nl group, 3.7% of the IFN-alpha 2a group and 14.7% of the control group (control vs IFN-alpha nl or IFN-alpha 2a, P < 0.05). The cumulative HCC development was higher in the control group than in the IFN-alpha nl group (P < 0.002) and the IFN-alpha 2a group (P = 0.06). The cumulative survival rate was lower in the control group than in the IFN-alpha nl group (P < 0.01) and the IFN-alpha 2a group (P = 0.02). Multivariate analysis revealed that IFN-alpha nl therapy and female gender are significant predictors of sustained response; preexisting cirrhosis, age at entry and IFN therapy are significant factors in both HCC development and survival. In conclusion, IFN-alpha nl treatment may have a better long-term effect on hepatitis B virus (HBV) clearance than IFN-alpha 2a and placebo, and IFN therapy may provide better long-term beneficial effects than placebo in terms of HBV clearance, reduction of HCC and prolonged survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: