This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background and Purpose: Erectile dysfunction (ED) affects quality of life following radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) planning provides superior visualization of potency-related anatomical structures compared to computed tomography (CT), enabling improved sparing. However, contouring these structures in clinical practice is time-intensive and requires expertise. Deep learning (DL) auto-contouring with MRI simulation could make neurovascular-sparing radiotherapy more accessible. Material and Methods: resolution) were obtained for 50 patients in treatment position. An expert uro-radiation oncologist contoured erectile function-related anatomy (neurovascular bundles [NVB], pudendal arteries [IPA], penile bulb [PB], corpora cavernosa [CC]) and target structures (prostate [PR], seminal vesicles [SV]). Forty datasets trained and ten tested a 3D nnU-net model. DL-generated contours were geometrically evaluated (surface Dice Score [sDSC], mean surface distance [MSD]) and validated by blinded expert review. Results: DL auto-segmentation achieved an average sDSC of 0.82 (IPA: 0.93, NVB: 0.71, PB: 0.84, CC: 0.90, PR: 0.74; SV: 0.79) and average MSD of 0.74 mm (IPA: 0.61 mm; NVB: 0.88 mm; PB: 0.63 mm; CC: 0.47 mm; PR 0.83 mm; SV: 1.01 mm). Blinded ratings showed no significant differences between DL and expert contours, except for pudendal arteries (Mean DL vs. expert; NVB: 82 vs. 85; PB: 86 vs. 88; CC: 83 vs. 88; PR 81 vs. 83; SV 78 vs. 81 all p > 0.05; IPA: 82 vs. 89; p = 0.028). Conclusion: Combining high-resolution MRI simulation with DL postprocessing enables accurate auto-contouring for MR-guided SBRT planning, potentially advancing neurovascular-sparing radiotherapy beyond current standards.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schubert et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: