Key result
An artificial neural network model accurately predicted acute kidney injury (AUC 77.9%), bleeding (86.5%), death (90.3%), and any adverse outcome (80.6%) after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Why the study?
Existing risk models for predicting complications after PCI are limited by accuracy and an inability to model non-linear relationships among predictors.
Does an artificial neural network model improve risk prediction of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention compared to currently used models?
Observational (n=28,005)
Yes
Does an artificial neural network model improve risk prediction of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention compared to currently used models?
Artificial neural network models significantly improve the prediction of major adverse events after PCI compared to traditional risk models.
Should not yet change PCI risk stratification; hypothesis-generating for neural network models pending prospective validation.
Objectives Complications after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are common and costly. Risk models for predicting the likelihood of acute kidney injury (AKI), bleeding, stroke and death are limited by accuracy and inability to use non-linear relationships among predictors. Our objective was to develop and validate a set of artificial neural networks (ANN) models to predict five adverse outcomes after PCI—AKI, bleeding, stroke, death and any adverse outcome. Methods We conducted a study of 28 005 patients (training and test cohorts of 21 004 and 7001 patients, respectively) undergoing PCI at five hospitals in the Barnes-Jewish Hospital system. We used an ANN multi-layer perceptron (MLP) architecture based on a set of 278 preprocessed variables. Model accuracy was tested using area under the receiver operating-characteristic curve (AUC). Improved prediction by the MLP model was assessed using integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and Brier score. Results The fully trained MLP model achieved convergence quickly (<10 epochs) and could accurately predict AKI (77.9%), bleeding (86.5%), death (90.3%) and any adverse outcome (80.6%) in the independent test set. Prediction of stroke was not satisfactory (69.9%). Compared with the currently used models for AKI, bleeding and death prediction, our models showed a significantly higher AUC, IDI and Brier score. Conclusions Using neural network-based models, we accurately predict major adverse events after PCI. Larger studies for replicability and longitudinal studies for evidence of impact are needed to establish these artificial intelligence methods in current PCI practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kulkarni et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n=28,005). Artificial neural network (ANN) model vs. Currently used risk models was evaluated on Prediction of acute kidney injury (AKI), bleeding, stroke, death and any adverse outcome. An artificial neural network model accurately predicted acute kidney injury (AUC 77.9%), bleeding (86.5%), death (90.3%), and any adverse outcome (80.6%) after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: