Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The value of ultrasonography as a diagnostic or screening tool is studied in 342 cases of potential ectopic pregnancy. Ultrasonography was used as a diagnostic technique when the echopattern was clear enough to pose a diagnosis of ectopic or non-ectopic pregnancy, including intra-uterine pregnancy, abortion or other pelvic abnormalities. Diagnosis was possible in 77 per cent of the examined patients, with 95 per cent correct diagnosis, 2 per cent false positives and 3 per cent false negatives. For ultrasonography simply as a screening technique whatever the echopattern might be, i.e. in all cases, 78 per cent were selected correctly, with 20 per cent false positives and 2 per cent false negatives. The high quality of the ultrasonic data, combined with the relative absence of the disadvantages of roentgen-rays and invasive techniques, makes ultrasonography the first examination of choice in cases of clinical suspicion of ectopic pregnancy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Levi et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: