Why the study?
Does femoral osteotomy compared to innominate osteotomy improve clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease?
Does femoral osteotomy compared to innominate osteotomy improve clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease?
Innominate osteotomy provides better radiographic coverage of the femoral head than femoral osteotomy in Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease, though clinical outcomes are similar.
Similar clinical results despite better coverage with innominate osteotomy; leaves open optimal choice pending randomized trials in Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease.
In a retrospective study of the surgical management of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease, 16 femoral osteotomies (Group A) and 18 innominate osteotomies (Group B) were compared Smith regard to clinical and radiographic results. All hips were classified preoperatively as Catterall Group 3 or Group 4. The average followup period was 6 years in Group A and 8 years in Group B. The clinical results were the same in the 2 groups and all patients were asymptomatic in the affected hip(s) during daily activity. The radiographic results were also the same in the 2 groups with regard to measurements of the sphericity of the femoral head (Mose's index and epiphyseal quotient) but the coverage of the femoral head by the acetabulum (center edge angle) was better in the innominate osteotomy group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moberg et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: