Key result
Progressive passive hyperthermia impaired descending voluntary drive, decreasing maximal voluntary contraction by 9% and cortical voluntary activation by 22% at the limit of thermal tolerance (P<0.05).
Why the study?
Does progressive passive hyperthermia alter cerebral perfusion and central motor drive in humans?
Does progressive passive hyperthermia alter cerebral perfusion and central motor drive in humans?
p-value: p=<0.05
Progressive passive hyperthermia impairs descending voluntary drive, likely due in part to reductions in cerebral blood flow velocity and hyperthermia-induced hyperventilation.
Hyperthermia may impair central motor drive in heat-stressed humans; leaves open cerebral perfusion's causal role in voluntary activation failure.
The present study examined the integrative effects of passive heating on cerebral perfusion and alterations in central motor drive. Eight participants underwent passive hyperthermia [0.5°C increments in core temperature (Tc) from normothermia (37 ± 0.3°C) to their limit of thermal tolerance (T-LIM; 39.0 ± 0.4°C)]. Blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery (CBFv) and respiratory responses were measured continuously. Arterial blood gases and blood pressure were obtained intermittently. At baseline and each Tc level, supramaximal femoral nerve stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were performed to assess neuromuscular and cortical function, respectively. At T-LIM, measures were (in a randomized order) also made during a period of breathing 5% CO(2) gas to restore eucapnia (+5% CO(2)). Mean heating time was 179 ± 51 min, with each 0.5°C increment in Tc taking 40 ± 10 min. CBFv was reduced by ∼20% below baseline from +0.5°C until T-LIM. Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of the knee extensors was decreased at T-LIM (-9 ± 10%; P < 0.05), and cortical voluntary activation (VA), assessed by TMS, was decreased at +1.5°C and T-LIM by 11 ± 8 and 22 ± 23%, respectively (P < 0.05). Corticospinal excitability (measured as the EMG response produced by TMS) was unaltered. Reductions in cortical VA were related to changes in ventilation (Ve; R(2) = 0.76; P < 0.05) and partial pressure of end-tidal CO(2) (Pet(CO(2)); R(2) = 0.63; P < 0.05) and to changes in CBFv (R(2) = 0.61; P = 0.067). Interestingly, although CBFv was not fully restored, MVC and cortical VA were restored towards baseline values during inhalation of 5% CO(2). These results indicate that descending voluntary drive becomes progressively impaired as Tc is increased, presumably due, in part, to reductions in CBFv and to hyperthermia-induced hyperventilation and subsequent hypocapnia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ross et al. (2011) studied this question. Progressive passive hyperthermia vs. Baseline (normothermia) was evaluated on Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and cortical voluntary activation (VA) (p=<0.05). Progressive passive hyperthermia impaired descending voluntary drive, decreasing maximal voluntary contraction by 9% and cortical voluntary activation by 22% at the limit of thermal tolerance (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: