Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Frequency-resolved optical gating (FROG) and its variations are the only techniques available for measuring complex pulses without a well-characterized reference pulse. We study the performance of the FROG generalized-projections algorithm for retrieving the intensity and phase of very complex ultrashort laser pulses [with time-bandwidth products (TBPs) of up to 100] in the presence of noise. We compare the performance of three versions of FROG: second-harmonic-generation (SHG) FROG, polarization-gate (PG) FROG, and cross-correlation FROG (XFROG), the last of which requires a well-characterized reference pulse. We found that the XFROG algorithm converged in all cases on the first initial guess. The PG FROG algorithm converged for all moderately complex pulses, for 99% of the pulses we tried, and for more than 95% of even the most complex pulses (TBP~100). The SHG FROG algorithm converged for 95% of the pulses we tried and for over 80% of even the most complex pulses. We found no additional ambiguities in any of these techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: