Why the study?
Does the KCNQ1 G643S single nucleotide polymorphism increase transmural dispersion of ventricular repolarization in a general Japanese population?
Does the KCNQ1 G643S single nucleotide polymorphism increase transmural dispersion of ventricular repolarization in a general Japanese population?
The KCNQ1 G643S polymorphism is associated with increased transmural dispersion of repolarization, particularly in elderly females, suggesting it may be an independent risk factor for secondary long QT syndrome.
May flag higher secondary LQTS risk in Japanese adults; leaves open prospective validation before risk-stratification use.
BACKGROUND: The KCNQ1 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), G643S, is known to be associated with secondary long QT syndrome (LQTS) and to cause a mild reduction in KCNQ1 current. However, the precise incidence and its association with QT intervals remain unknown in the greater cohort of the population in Japan. METHODS AND RESULTS: The genotype was screened at codon 643 of KCNQ1 in 992 residents of a farming community. Eighty-eight individuals (female/male =52/36, 8.9%) were found to have a heterozygous G643S SNP. Matching both gender and age, we randomly selected 243 control (G643G) cases and compared the electrocardiogram parameters in both groups; QT, QTf (QT corrected by Fridericia's formula) intervals, the peak and the end of the T wave (Tpe) interval, and the Tpe/QT ratio. The latter 2 reflect the transmural dispersion of ventricular repolarization (TDR). In G643S carriers, both Tpe and Tpe/QT were significantly longer than in non-carriers, without significant QT prolongation. Both genders showed a tendency for an increase in QTf with aging. In females, both Tpe and Tpe/QT showed a similar significant increase with age, which was not observed in males. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly females, G643S might be an independent risk factor for secondary LQTS by causing a greater TDR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ozawa et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: