Key result
A novel nonsense mutation (R179X) in the SCN5A gene was identified in a 67-year-old male with Brugada syndrome, causing a non-functional cardiac sodium channel and dynamic ST-segment changes.
Case Report (n=1)
No
A novel nonsense mutation (R179X) in the SCN5A gene causes a complete loss of sodium channel function and is associated with atypical, dynamic Brugada-type ECG changes and recurrent ventricular fibrillation.
Novel R179X SCN5A mutation expands Brugada genotype spectrum with dynamic ECG changes; hypothesis-generating, leaves clinical risk implications open.
A 67-year-old male underwent genetic testing under the diagnosis of Brugada syndrome because of recurrent ventricular fibrillation with coincident ST-segment elevation in either right precordial, inferior leads or both since the age of 55 years. Screening of gene mutations using denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) and direct sequencing identified a novel nonsense mutation (R179X) of SCN5A in a heterozygous manner. The functional assay for the identified mutation, using a whole-cell patch clamp in the heterologous expression system, revealed that the nonsense mutation, located in the second transmembrane segment of the first domain (DI-S2) of the alpha-subunit, failed to synthesize the complete structure of the cardiac sodium channel, thus causing the non-functional channel. Coding effects by the gene mutation was altered during the 12-year follow-up, which might affect the clinical features of the patient through the ion channel density in the ventricle, dynamics of repolarization abnormality and conduction disturbance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawamura et al. (2009) conducted a case report in Brugada syndrome (n=1). SCN5A nonsense mutation (R179X) was evaluated. A novel nonsense mutation (R179X) in the SCN5A gene was identified in a 67-year-old male with Brugada syndrome, causing a non-functional cardiac sodium channel and dynamic ST-segment changes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: