Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Alternative effluent charge programs are examined with regard to cost, charge payments, financial burden, and punitive effects. These efficiency and equity issues are evaluated for constant unit charge programs and for effluent charge schedule programs; the latter are found to reduce the charge payments and the financial burden significantly. Example charge schedule solutions are also shown to compare favorably to the corresponding direct regulation solutions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brill et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: