Structural deterioration due to environmental and mechanical stressors is a major concern for civil and marine structures. Inspection actions can reduce uncertainties, facilitate decision-making on maintenance, and in general assist life-cycle management. Risk-based inspection (RBI) planning is a useful tool to minimize life-cycle cost while preserving safety margin of structures. This paper compares (a) static RBI (SRBI) planning where inspection schedule and maintenance criteria are time- and evidence-invariant and (b) adaptive RBI (ARBI) planning where decisions on inspection and maintenance (I&M) are made sequentially and reactively to I&M actions. Specifically, three RBI planning methods, i.e., SRBI with Monte Carlo simulation, ARBI based on Bayesian networks, and ARBI based on partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDP), are compared based on a generic Markovian deterioration model (MDM). In addition, it is demonstrated that ARBI planning can be extended from MDMs to many physics-based deterioration models such as corrosion and fatigue models. The advantages and disadvantages of different RBI planning methods are summarized. Potentials of ARBI planning are also discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: