Background: Nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) poses substantial public health risks in large cities globally. Concentrations of NO 2 shows high spatial variation, yet intra-urban measurements of NO 2 in Chinese cities are sparse. The size of Chinese cities and shortage of some datasets is challenging for high spatial resolution modelling. The aim here was to combine advantages of dispersion and land-use regression (LUR) modelling to simulate population exposure to NO 2 at high spatial resolution for health burden calculations, in the example megacity of Guangzhou. Methods: Ambient concentrations of NO 2 simulated by the ADMS-Urban dispersion model at 83 ‘virtual’ monitoring sites, selected to span both the range of NO 2 concentration and weighting by population density, were used to develop a LUR model of 2017 annual-mean NO 2 across Guangzhou at 25 m × 25 m spatial resolution. Results: The LUR model was validated against both the 83 virtual sites (adj R 2 : 0.96, RMSE: 5.48 μ g m −3 ; LOOCV R 2 : 0.96, RMSE: 5.64 μ g m −3 ) and, independently, against available observations ( n = 11, R 2: : 0.63, RMSE: 18.0 μ g m −3 ). The modelled population-weighted long-term average concentration of NO 2 across Guangzhou was 52.5 μ g m −3 , which contributes an estimated 7270 (6960−7620) attributable deaths. Reducing concentrations in exceedance of the China air quality standard/WHO air quality guideline of 40 μ g m −3 would reduce NO 2 -attributable deaths by 1900 (1820–1980). Conclusions: We demonstrate a general hybrid modelling method that can be employed in other cities in China to model ambient NO 2 concentration at high spatial resolution for health burden estimation and epidemiological study. By running the dispersion model with alternative mitigation policies, new LUR models can be constructed to quantify policy effectiveness on NO 2 population health burden.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: