4-(Phenylethynyl)-6-phenyl-1,4-dihydropyridine derivatives are selective antagonists at human A3 adenosine receptors, with Ki values in a radioligand binding assay vs [125I]AB-MECA (N6-(4-amino-3-iodobenzyl)-5'-(N-methylcarbamoyl)adenosine) in the submicromolar range. In this study, structure-activity relationships at various positions of the dihydropyridine ring (the 3- and 5-acyl substituents, the 4-aryl substituent, and 1-methyl group) were probed synthetically. Using the combined protection of the 1-ethoxymethyl and the 5-[2-(trimethylsilyl)ethyl] ester groups, a free carboxylic acid was formed at the 5-position allowing various substitutions. Selectivity of the new analogues for cloned human A3 adenosine receptors was determined vs radioligand binding at rat brain A1 and A2A receptors. Structure-activity analysis at adenosine receptors indicated that pyridyl, furyl, benzofuryl, and thienyl groups at the 4-position resulted in, at most, only moderate selectivity for A3 adenosine receptors. Ring substitution (e.g., 4-nitro) of the 4-phenylethylnyl group did not provide enhanced selectivity, as it did for the 4-styryl-substituted dihydropyridines. At the 3-position of the dihydropyridine ring, esters were much more selective for A3 receptors than closely related thioester, amide, and ketone derivatives. A cyclic 3-keto derivative was 5-fold more potent at A3 receptors than a related open-ring analogue. At the 5-position, a homologous series of phenylalkyl esters and a series of substituted benzyl esters were prepared and tested. (Trifluoromethyl)-, nitro-, and other benzyl esters substituted with electron-withdrawing groups were specific for A3 receptors with nanomolar Ki values and selectivity as high as 37000-fold. A functionalized congener bearing an [(aminoethyl)amino]carbonyl group was also prepared as an intermediate in the synthesis of biologically active conjugates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: