Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The paper begins with the recognition that modern society is not sustained, and considers that sustainability of a village is related to residences in it. In this paper, I consider that the residence is related to environment, community and culture in the area of Noto Peninsula destroyed by earthquake. And I insist on sustainability of residence is related to the sustainability in a village. It is predicted that many villages will collapse, which is called survival crises. But many villages are still living now. In this paper, I try to reveal the internal logic of sustainable development in rural, and how to construct a planning theory based on it becomes a problem in future. I think that Inherit and carry forward value in aspect of environment, social, and culture is the main reason for sustainable living, which decide on sustainable development in rural area. Planning is a subject which can create value, and it is also necessary to reconfirm that it is a normative science.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Juichi YAMAZAKI (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: