Consent and violence amongst men in the context of sexualised drug use: A systematic scoping review

This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.

• A systematic scoping review investigated violence amongst men during sexualised drug use. • Qualitative and quantitative data were included from twenty-eight studies. • Sexual violence facilitated by non-consensual drug administration was most often reported. • Some participants were unwilling to label non-consensual sex as rape. • Community involvement in further research and policymaking is essential. Sexualised drug use (SDU) is a highly prevalent phenomenon of increasing public health significance in communities of men who have sex with men (MSM). This prospectively registered PRISMA-ScR-adherent systematic scoping review examines the current state of knowledge surrounding violence amongst MSM in the context of SDU. A broad search was conducted across four databases, with no restrictions. Studies citing or cited by all database-identified records retained for full-text review were retrieved and screened. Three journals were hand-searched across the past five years, and three searches were conducted on Google Scholar. In addition, 13 key opinion leaders were contacted via email to request any additional published or unpublished data. The twenty-eight studies included in the final synthesis reported mostly qualitative data from geographically diverse non-representative samples, predominantly relating to sexual violence with other typologies seldom investigated or reported. Although quantitative data were limited, sexual violence appeared common in this context and was directly associated with impaired mental health and suicidality. Some participants reported first- or second-hand accounts of non-consensual administration of incapacitating doses of GHB/GBL to men who were subsequently raped. This was frequently perpetrated by men whose age, status, or financial privilege afforded them power over their victims. While reports from some participants suggested context-specific blurring of the lines of consent, a few quotes demonstrated a dearth of knowledge surrounding the centrality of consent in lawful sex. Given the historical denigration of MSM, any efforts to further investigate or address this issue must be community-led.