Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
KAT1 and AKT1 belong to the multigenic family of the inwardly rectifying Shaker-like plant K+ channels. They were biochemically characterized after expression in insect cells using recombinant baculoviruses. The channels were solubilized from microsomal fractions prepared from infected cells (among eight different detergents only one, L-alpha-lysophosphatidylcholine, was efficient for solubilization), and purified to homogeneity using immunoaffinity (KAT1) or ion-exchange and size exclusion (AKT1) techniques. The following results were obtained with the purified polypeptides: (i) neither KAT1 nor AKT1 was found to be glycosylated; (ii) both polypeptides were mainly present as homotetrameric structures, supporting the hypothesis of a tetrameric structure for the functional channels; (iii) no heteromeric KAT1/AKT1 assembly was detected when the two polypeptides were co-expressed in insect cells. The use of the two-hybrid system in yeast also failed to detect any interaction between KAT1 and AKT1 polypeptides. Because of these negative results, the hypothesis that plant K+-channel subunits are able to co-assemble without any discrimination, previously put forward based on co-expression in Xenopus oocytes of various K+-channel subunits (including KAT1 and AKT1), has still to be supported by independent approaches. Co-localization of channel subunits within the same plant tissue/cell does not allow us to conclude that the subunits form heteromultimeric channels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Urbach et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: