Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
It is shown that the addition of a coexchanger does not always improve the selectivity of an ion-selective electrode. As a model case, the selectivity toward divalent primary ions I2+ in the presence of monovalent interference J+ is numerically simulated for membranes based on ion-exchanger R- and doped with a coexchanger (ionic additive) S+. It is, for the first time, demonstrated that the addition of a coexchanger, together with a high mobility of ion-exchanger sites, may be either beneficial or harmful to selectivity. Accordingly, two distinctive representatives of systems, i.e., membrane/solution are discussed. The theory is illustrated with experimental data obtained from PVC membranes based on calcium bis(2ethylhexyl)-phosphate plasticized with tris(2ethylhexyl)phosphate and doped with tetradecylammonium. Electrodes with these membranes exhibit both types of selectivity behavior. Interference from lithium with a calcium response may be sufficiently decreased by the addition of tetradecylammonium, while the interference from potassium and cesium was increased in the doped membranes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mikhelson et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: