Why the study?
There is no universally accepted technique for anesthetic management during CABGC, and studies evaluating anesthetic maintenance are very limited.
Do different anesthesia maintenance methods affect hemodynamics in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery?
Do different anesthesia maintenance methods affect hemodynamics in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery?
Sevoflurane-fentanyl maintenance was associated with greater hemodynamic stability in CABG; leaves open superiority over TIVA pending randomized trials.
Objective: General anesthesia management in coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABGC) should preserve myocardial function, prevent ischemic damage, and maintain stable hemodynamics. There is not a universally accepted technique for anesthetic management during CABGC. Drugs or drug combinations and maintenance of infusions are decided based on the pathophysiological condition of the patient and the individual preference and experience of the anesthesiologist (1). Although there are many studies about an anesthesia induction in CABGC, studies about anesthetic maintenance are very limited. In this study, we compared the hemodynamic effects of three different methods that were used in anesthetic maintenance in CABGC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ak et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: