Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the prevalence of inflammation and bone destruction of hand joints in rhupus patients using ultrasound examination.
Do rhupus patients have a higher prevalence of joint inflammation and bone destruction compared to SLE patients with hand arthropathy?
Do rhupus patients have a higher prevalence of joint inflammation and bone destruction compared to SLE patients with hand arthropathy?
Rhupus patients have significantly higher rates of synovitis, synovial hyperplasia, and bone destruction on ultrasound compared to SLE patients, highlighting the need for targeted joint protection.
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of inflammation and bone destruction of hand joints in rhupus patients through ultrasound examination. MATERIAL AND METHODS Ten rhupus patients and 33 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with hand arthropathy were recruited in this single-center study, and the clinical features and ultrasound manifestations of these patients were analyzed. RESULTS We discovered that rhupus patients were older (47.31±4.35 years vs. 38.58±2.50 years, P=0.040), had longer duration of disease (median 72 months vs. median 12 months, P=0.040), had a higher positive rate (70% vs. 10.71%, P<0.001), and had higher titers of anti-CCP antibody (42.633±14.520 vs. 2.121±0.970, P<0.001) than SLE patients with arthropathy. More importantly, the prevalence rates of synovial hyperplasia (90% vs. 42.42%, P=0.008), synovitis (90% vs. 18.18%, P<0.001), synovial hyperplasia (70% vs. 10.71%, P<0.001), and bone destruction (70% vs. 6.06%, P<0.001) were higher in rhupus patients than in SLE patients with arthropathy. CONCLUSIONS Rhupus patients are more prone to develop synovitis, synovial hyperplasia, and bone destruction. Therefore, more attention should be paid to protection of the joints in rhupus patients.
May warrant closer ultrasound monitoring in rhupus; cross-sectional data leaves open prognostic and therapeutic implications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: