Why the study?
What are the outcomes of left atrioventricular valve replacement following repair of atrioventricular septal defect?
What are the outcomes of left atrioventricular valve replacement following repair of atrioventricular septal defect?
Left atrioventricular valve replacement after AVSD repair carries high mortality in infants and a high risk of complete heart block, supporting the preference for secondary valvoplasty to delay replacement.
High infant mortality after LAVV replacement post-AVSD repair warrants caution in timing; leaves open whether secondary repair can safely delay replacement.
Summary A retrospective analysis of 55 patients who underwent replacement of the left atrioventricular valve following surgery for atrioventricular septal defect with separate right and left atrioventricular valves or with a common valvar orifice has revealed a marked decrease in the need for valvar replacement over time. Between 1983 and 1987, the incidence of replacement following repair has been 3% in infants. Overall early mortality for the entire series, extending from 1970 to 1987, was 22%. Mortality in the first year of life was 58%, which was significantly greater than mortality beyond one year of age (14%, p<0.01). Obstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract was a frequent incremental risk factor for death during infancy. The incidence of complete heart block (25%) is disappointingly high, and may reflect distortion of the left atrioventricular junction in an attempt to place as large a prosthesis as possible. The incidence of complete heart block has not decreased with time. These results confirm the desirability of secondary valvoplasty procedures to enable a child to be larger before ultimate replacement of the valve is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kadoba et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: