In Brief BACKGROUND: In this study, we evaluated the predicted blood and effect-site C50 for propofol and remifentanil target-controlled infusion and the Bispectral Index (BIS) values at loss of consciousness (LOC) and response to a standard noxious painful stimulus in Chinese patients. We hypothesized that these values would be different from previously published data on Caucasians. METHODS: Five medical centers enrolled 405 ASA physical status I and II unpremedicated Chinese patients (97 men, 308 women) aged 18–65 yr. Propofol was initially given to a predicted blood concentration of 1.2 μg/mL and thereafter increased by 0.3 μg/mL every 30 s until Observer’s Assessment of Alertness and Sedation score was 1. The propofol was kept constant, and remifentanil was given to provide a predict blood concentration of 2.0 ng/mL, and then increased by 0.3 ng/mL every 30 s until loss of response to a tetanic stimulus. BIS (version 3.22, BIS Quattro sensor) was also recorded. RESULTS: The propofol effect-site C50 at LOC was 2.2 (2.2–2.3) μg/mL. The remifentanil effect-site C50 at loss of response to painful stimulus was 3.3 ng/mL. Fifty percent of patients lost consciousness at a BIS value of 58, and 95% had lost consciousness at BIS values <40. The BIS value at C50 at loss of response to painful stimulus was 65.4, which was higher than that at LOS (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The predicted blood and effect-site concentrations of propofol and BIS values at LOC were lower than those in previously published studies of Caucasian populations. IMPLICATIONS: Half of Chinese patients lose conscious response at an effect-site propofol concentration of 2.2 ng/mL and a Bispectral Index value of 58, and lose response to painful stimuli at a remifentanil effect-site concentration of 3.3 ng/mL. The propofol concentration and Bispectral Index values for loss of consciousness are lower than reported in Caucasian populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: