A computational comparison of several general purpose nonlinear programming algorithms is presented. This study was motivated by the preliminary results in [12] which show that the recently developed ellipsoid algorithm is competitive with a widely used augmented Lagrangian algorithm. To provide a better perspective on the value of ellipsoid algorithms in nonlinear programming, the present study includes some of the most highly regarded nonlinear programming algorithms and is a much more comprehensive study than [12]. The algorithms considered here are chosen from four distinct classes and 50 well-known test problems are used. The algorithms used represent augmented Lagrangian, ellipsoid, generalized reduced gradient, and iterative quadratic programming methods. Results regarding robustness and relative efficiency are presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ecker et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: