We compare a recently proposed generalized eigensystem approach and a new modified generalized eigensystem approach to more widely used truncated singular value decomposition and zero‐order Tikhonov regularization for solving multidimensional elliptic inverse problems. As a test case, we use a finite element representation of a homogeneous eccentric spheres model of the inverse problem of electrocardiography. Special attention is paid to numerical issues of accuracy, convergence, and robustness. While the new generalized eigensystem methods are substantially more demanding computationally, they exhibit improved accuracy and convergence compared with widely used methods and offer substantially better robustness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olson et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: