The second harmonic generations of the dimeric complexes [M 2 (μ-X)(μ-SC n H 2 n +1 )(RC 6 H 3 CH NC 6 H 4 R‘)] (M = Pd, Pt; X = Cl, CH 3 COO, ( R )-CH 3 CHClCOO; R, R‘ = NO 2 and OC 8 H 17 or N(C 4 H 9 ) 2; n = 4 or 8) and the monomeric complexes [Pd(RC 6 H 3 CH NC 6 H 4 R‘)L] (L = C 5 H 5 (Cp), CH 3 COCHCOCH 3 (acac)) and [Pd(RC 6 H 3 CH NC 6 H 4 R‘)(CNC 6 H 4 R‘‘)Cl] (R‘‘ = NO 2, OC n H 2 n +1, N(C m H 2 m +1 ) 2; n = 4 or 8; m = 1 or 4) have been measured, and the influence of the position of donor and acceptor groups is discussed and compared with that of the free imine ligands. The value of the hyperpolarizability (β) is raised only when a strong donor group is located in the cyclometalated ring. Moreover, the β value has been enhanced, too, in the cyclopentadienyl monomer complex by as much as 80% with respect to the β value of the corresponding free imine. The molecular structure of [Pd 2 (μ-Cl)(μ-SC 4 H 9 )(N(C 4 H 9 ) 2 C 6 H 3 CH NC 6 H 4 NO 2 ] has been determined by an X-ray diffraction analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buey et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: