This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Aim We evaluated whether Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Derived T Stage independently predicts nodal disease on Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) PET/CT in patients with high-risk primary prostate cancer, and developed a predictive model for clinical decision support. Materials and methods MRI-derived T Stage, Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA), Gleason score, age and PSMA node status were analysed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression in 152 men with high-risk primary prostate cancer who underwent pre-treatment multiparametric MRI and PSMA PET/CT. Model performance was assessed with area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis. Subgroup analyses evaluated Gleason 3 + 4 and 4 + 3 disease separately. Results MRI T3b and T4 stages were independently and significantly associated with increased risk of PSMA-positive nodal disease ( p < 0.001 and p = 0.016, respectively). T3a disease was not significantly independently associated with PSMA-positive nodal disease ( p = 0.086). T3b remained an independent predictor even in Gleason 4 + 3 cases ( p = 0.026; odds ratio ≈ 23.57). The final model (AUC = 0.863) was well-calibrated and demonstrated clinical net benefit on decision curve analysis. In our cohort, patients with PSA < 20 ng/mL, MRI-derived T2 disease, and Gleason score < 8 (including both 3 + 4 and 4 + 3 patterns) demonstrated a 0% rate of PSMA-positive nodal disease. Conclusion MRI-derived T stage T3b disease is a strong independent predictor of PSMA-positive nodal disease. These findings support guideline-based staging criteria and support the integration of MRI-derived T Stage into PSMA PET/CT triage workflows.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Courtney et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: