Abstract “Monomolecular property (p) versus molar mass (M) relationships” of the type p = Kp · Map as would result from an experimental determination of p and M of a polymer‐homologous series of strictly monomolecular polymers can also be obtained from a polymer‐homologous series of polymolecular samples or fractions, provided their correct corresponding averages p and M are determined (Principle of Corresponding Averages). In order to obtain the monomolecular intrinsic viscosity [η] vs. M relationship (Mark‐Houwink relationship), the corresponding averages weight‐average intrinsic viscosity ([η]w ≡ [η]) and viscosity‐average molar mass (M[η]) of a series of polymer‐homologous, polymolecular polymer samples or fractions have to be determined experimentally. Accordingly, the corresponding monomolecular relationships sedimentation coefficient s vs. M, diffusion coefficient D vs. M, and mean‐square radius of gyration 〈r2〉 vs. M are obtained by the determination of a series of couples of the corresponding averages s vs. M, D vs. M, and 〈r2〉 vs. M, respectively. The experimental determination of the corresponding averages presented is possible by different methods, including the determination of the molar mass distribution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rolf E. Bareiss (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: