Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The main motivation of this paper is to weaken the conditions that imply the correspondence between the solution of a constrained problem and the unconstrained minimization of a continuously differentiable function. In particular, a new continuously differentiable exact penalty function is proposed for the solution of nonlinear programming problems. Under mild assumptions, a complete equivalence can be established between the solution of the original constrained problem and the unconstrained minimization of this penalty function on a perturbation of the feasible set. This new penalty function and its exactness properties allow us to define globally and superlinearly convergent algorithms to solve nonlinear programming problems. As an example, a Newton-type algorithm is described which converges locally in one iteration in case of quadratic programming problems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stefano Lucidi (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: