Why the study?
Cardiovascular diseases are the second most frequent cause of death in prostate cancer patients, prompting an evaluation of the cardiovascular safety of hormone therapy.
Does the choice of hormone therapy affect cardiovascular safety in prostate cancer patients?
Does the choice of hormone therapy affect cardiovascular safety in prostate cancer patients?
GnRH antagonists and enzalutamide may offer better cardiovascular safety profiles compared to GnRH agonists and abiraterone in prostate cancer patients, highlighting the need for careful selection of hormone therapy to minimize cardiotoxicity.
Background. As of 2019, prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common malignancy in men living in Russia (15.7 % of all cancer cases detected in 2019). Cardiovascular diseases, in particular atherosclerosis, are believed to be the second most frequent cause of death in PCa patients.Aim. To evaluate cardiovascular safety of hormone therapy for PCa on the example of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and antagonists (leuprolide and degarelix), second-generation antiandrogens (enzalutamide), and steroidogenesis inhibitors (abiraterone).Materials and methods. We analyzed the results of original studies assessing cardiovascular safety of hormone therapy in PCa patients published in 2020–2021 and indexed in PubMed. The results of other meta-analyses and systematic reviews were not included.The search for publications was performed using the PubMed database and the Google system. The following key words were used for searching: prostate cancer, cardiovascular risks, cardiovascular safety, outcomes, atherosclerosis, etc. We analyzed studies published between January 2020 and January 2022. Articles in English and Russian were selected manually; no filters were applied.Results. We examined the results of the latest and most relevant original studies assessing cardiovascular safety of key innovative hormone therapies for PCa. The majority of recent studies were based on routine clinical practice; they were registered in highly specialized cancer registers.Hormone therapy is associated with cardiotoxicity, which increases the risk of non-cancer related death in PCa patients. New, sometimes conflicting evidence is being constantly accumulated. This evidence suggests that the GnRH antagonist (degarelix) has a better cardiovascular safety profile than the GnRH agonist (leuprolide); enzalutamide is safer than abiraterone. Further search for prognostic biomarkers in PCa patients is needed.Conclusion. More high-quality studies analyzing adverse cardiovascular events in PCa patients conducted in routine clinical practice and registered in the online databases are the next stage to identify benefits of one antitumor drug over another. This will help to choose optimal hormone therapy algorithms for PCa patients and, therefore, increase their overall survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Андреев et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: