Why the study?
The volume regulated anion channel (VRAC) is involved in cancer cell behaviour and response to therapies, prompting investigation into the effects of the VRAC blocker DCPIB in PDAC and melanoma.
DCPIB directly targets BK channels and acutely increases intracellular Ca2+ in melanoma and PDAC cell lines, highlighting important off-target effects for future drug development.
DCPIB off-target BK activation cautions against its use as selective VRAC blocker; leaves open selectivity testing for cancer models.
Background and purpose The volume regulated anion channel (VRAC) is known to be involved in different aspects of cancer cell behaviour and response to therapies. For this reason, we investigated the effect of DCPIB, a presumably specific blocker of VRAC, in two types of cancer: pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and melanoma. Experimental approach We used patch‐clamp electrophysiology, supported by Ca 2+ imaging, gene expression analysis, docking simulation and mutagenesis. We employed two PDAC lines (Panc‐1 and MiaPaCa‐2), as well as a primary (IGR39) and a metastatic (IGR37) melanoma line. Key results DCPIB markedly increased whole‐cell currents in Panc‐1, MiaPaca2 and IGR39, but not in IGR37 cells. The currents were mostly mediated by K Ca 1.1 channels, commonly known as BK channels. We confirmed DCPIB activation of BK channels also in HEK293 cells transfected with α subunits of this channel. Further experiments showed that in IGR39, and to a smaller degree also in Panc‐1 cells, DCPIB induced a rapid Ca 2+ influx. This, in turn, indirectly potentiated BK channels and, in IGR39 cells, additionally activated other Ca 2+ ‐dependent channels. However, Ca 2+ influx was not required for activation of BK channels by DCPIB, as such activation involved the extracellular part of the protein and we have identified a residue crucial for binding. Conclusion and implications DCPIB directly targeted BK channels and, also, acutely increased intracellular Ca 2+ . Our findings extend the list of DCPIB effects that should be taken into consideration for future development of DCPIB‐based modulators of ion channels and other membrane proteins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zuccolini et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: